Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 02_browsing:05_support:02_frequency [2022/01/06 17:52] – Simone Ueberwasser
+++ 02_browsing:05_support:02_frequency [2022/01/06 17:57] – Simone Ueberwasser
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 {{:02_browsing:05_support:frequency1.png?400|}}
 Figure 1: Formulating the query and selecting ''Frequency Analysis'' from ''More''
@@ Line 11: / Line 12: @@
 If you click on "Perform frequency analysis" at the bottom, you see your results as in Figure 2.
-{{ :02_browsing:resultsfa.png?600 |Results of Frequency Analysis}}
+{{:02_browsing:05_support:frequency2.png?400|}}
 Figure 2: Results of frequency analysis
-As you can see in Figure 2, we receive a full list of auxiliaries and verb forms with their respective frequencies. It is obvious that there are false positives like //Tiser//, but we also have interesting examples like //[avoir] regarder//. This list can now also be downloaded as a text file for further processing by clicking "Download as CSV".
+As you can see in Figure 2, we receive a full list of auxiliaries and verb forms with their respective frequencies. It is obvious that there are false positives, but if you perform the query, you will also findinteresting examples like //[avoir] demander//. If you now check the query ''lemma="avoir" & tok="demander" & #1 . #2'', you will see, that this is in fact a misspelling.
+This list can now also be downloaded as a text file for further processing by clicking "Download as CSV".