Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 02_questionnaire [2022/01/04 07:09] – ↷ Page moved and renamed from 02_questionnaire:start to 02_questionnaire Simone Ueberwasser
+++ 02_questionnaire [2022/10/16 11:16] (current) – [SMS usage] Simone Ueberwasser
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== The Questionnaire ======
+====== THE QUESTIONNAIRE ======
 =====About the questionnaire=====
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 =====Questions asked=====
 If you are interested in the exact wording of the questions, please check the documents in the original questionnaires above.
+In this documentation, only questions that can be queried in the corpus are documented. In the original questionnaire there were more questions with open text fields that were only used for internal evaluation.
 ====General information====
@@ Line 42: / Line 44: @@
 **SMS Use in years** The informant was asked, for how many years he has been using SMS. A selection was presented:
-less than a year
+  * less than a year
   * 1-3 years
   * 3-5 years
@@ Line 79: / Line 81: @@
   * a free field others.
-In the original questionnaire there are more questions with text fields. Since they cannot be evaluated in the corpus, we do not discuss them here.
 =====Second collection=====
 The second collection took place nearly two years after the first one and was set up for the special needs of research in Italian and Romansh. Accordingly, the questionnaire was adjusted slightly to adjust to the needs of this user group but also to cover the quick technical development. The following was changed:
 For all questions concerning languages (e.g. mothertongue), the option Italian dialect ("dialetto della Svizzera italiana") was added. An additional profession was included: farming or forestry ("agricoltura e foreste") An additional question about mobile phone use was added: do you use a smartphone? ("Si serve di uno smartphone (iPhone o simili)?"). Possible answers were yes and no, but it was also possible to leave the question empty. When working with the corpus, it is imperative to realize that these questions were only asked during the second collection. Thus, the percentage of people, who consider the Italian dialect as their mother tongue, cannot be calculated by setting the total number of participants as 100%. Instead, the number of participants of the second collection has to be taken as 100%. The same goes for smarphones etc.